Facebook, as a communication platform with the promise of democratizing the world, has instead impacted weak political systems rather than strengthening democracies. While developers and policymakers were hopeful about the promises of these technologies, reality has shown that technology cannot replace political institutions.
The Bitter Experience of Facebook in Countries with Weak Institutions
Instead of creating democratic platforms, Facebook has become a tool for amplifying hate, misinformation, and ethnic violence. In countries with weak institutions, a lack of media literacy, and deep ethnic divisions, this platform not only failed to assist democracies but also led to their weakening. This bitter experience shows that technology cannot solve political problems; rather, it exacerbates them.
Read more: Lithuania challenged China and paid attention to Taiwan
Artificial Intelligence and Political Challenges
Currently, artificial intelligence is emerging as a revolutionary technology with great promises. However, AI also cannot solve political problems. This technology can process information and help identify issues, but the decision about which problems should be addressed lies with political institutions. If AI is placed within inefficient and unaccountable institutions, it may contribute to reinforcing systemic flaws.
Ultimately, the reality that technologies cannot replace political institutions and real reforms is an important lesson. Developers and policymakers must recognize that political problems require political solutions, not just technological ones. While technology can serve as an effective tool for serving society, without strong and accountable institutions, these tools may become instruments for undermining democracies.
Read more: Australia and the next Secretary-General of the United Nations need each other · Creating a funding mechanism for civil society organizations in Canada
